News - Russia: Nationals support Moscow as host city | Eurovision Song Contest News - 2009 Moscow, Russia 

member login (forgot password?) subscribe (free!)

Credits

Written by

Víctor Hondal

Published

4/Jun at 18:55

Source(s)

kommersant.com, RIA Novosti

News

russia

43% to St Petersburg's 18%

Russia: Nationals support Moscow as host city

Russian National Centre for the Public Opinion Research (VTsIOM) has released the results of a poll on which city should host the 2009 Eurovision Song Contest. The capital city Moscow widely gathered the massive support from Russians, with 43% of the vote.

Moscow stands out as the most preferred option for Russians to host next year's Eurovision Song Contest. Far behind, the second largest city of the country, St Petersburg, receives 18% of the vote. In third place with 5% of the vote - and unlikely to host the contest - is Sochi, a town by the Black Sea and organiser of the 2014 Winter Olympic Games.

Results are not homogeneous in the entire country. For instance, support given to Moscow and St Petersburg is very similar in the North-Western part of Russia. The percentages of the two cities there are very close (31%-32%).

The National Centre for the Public Opinion Research held this poll from May 31 to June 1, covering 1,600 respondents in 153 settlements of 46 regions of Russia. The statistic error does not exceed 3.4%.


Related polls




Go directly to the reactions

Reactions

When reacting to a news item, please stick to the topic. Inappropriate messages (swearing, racism, hate, etc.), messages in other languages than English and spam (which includes URL advertising) will be deleted and you risk your account being removed. Reacting on newsitems is only possible when logged in as a member. Still don't have member account?

Click here to react  Click here to become a member (free!)


Tim - [16334]
Wed 11 Jun 2008 08:30:53

Who exactly is Mr BORE? Someone important from the Kremlin,?an ice cream seller? Some Lada car salesman?


BURR [36045]
Tue 10 Jun 2008 21:47:17

@ Jonny K [46883]
Your posts mke so much sense


Jonny K [46883]
Tue 10 Jun 2008 21:43:54

Whatever!!! You're trying to tell a native english speaker how to speak good english . . . . . . . wtf!!!


BURR [36045]
Tue 10 Jun 2008 21:40:03

@ Jonny K [46883]
I agree you need to find some desent English


Jonny K [46883]
Tue 10 Jun 2008 21:37:31

BURR:

hehe yeah lol thats funny because english is my first language!! :)


Jonny K [46883]
Tue 10 Jun 2008 16:41:44

I agree with tim that Burr needs to find a better translator!! lol


BURR [36045]
Tue 10 Jun 2008 12:36:13

@ Tim - [16334]
Try to find sense in your


Tim - [16334]
Tue 10 Jun 2008 06:57:01

You are right Alex, the Noregian song did indeed benefit from block voting, further evidence of how crazy the ESC is now. I said I liked the song...

You are also correct in saying that UK singers tend to vanish, probably because they were not known in the first place. No big UK stars will normally agree to appear in ESC as the contest has such a poor reputation...incidentally rarely are any of the songs that are in ESC (winners or not) released in the UK, as they just would not sell. This year is no exception, there is no possibility of that Dima song selling because it is so dated.

Mr BURR (bore), please finder a better translation site, as your posts do not make much sense




BURR [36045]
Tue 10 Jun 2008 04:03:56

Moscow 2009
Like it or not!


Alex K [51966]
Tue 10 Jun 2008 00:15:39

@ Tim
You favourite Norway has benefited from the Scandinavian block voting tremendously, and yet we only hear you complaining about Eastern European block voting. That’s hypocrisy, pure and simple.

As for the UK, the always say they had “a really good song” and that voting was political. But after Eurovision, their singers always disappear, never to be seen on a UK Chart again. Where is Daz Sampson, Jemini and Lindsay Dracas? Andy Abraham’s “Even If” has disappeared from the UK chart this week, and I doubt we’ll ever hear about him again.


BURR [36045]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 23:54:03

Good luck in Moscow 2009!
If you do not want to listen - i iis your own problem!


BURR [36045]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 23:16:52

@ Jonny K [46883]

Good luck UK!!!!


Jonny K [46883]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 21:35:40

BURR :
"Your posts do not make ANYTHING!!! "
What do you mean!!! lol :)


BURR [36045]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 21:27:29

@ Jonny K [46883]
AT ALL!!!


BURR [36045]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 21:26:20

@ Jonny K [46883]
Your posts do not make ANYTHING!!!


Jonny K [46883]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 21:06:03

burr . . . . . . . YOUR POSTS DON'T MAKE SENSE!!!! :) :D ;)


Mina Carnation [51405]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 20:50:56

BURR,
learn some English please...whatever gave you the idea I wanted Athens 2009?
I wanted Moscow 2009 ever since I heard Believing for the first time and I thought it was obvious by my posts that I just loved the song and was glad Russia won.
(It wouldn't be bad if Greece had won ofcourse, but we've won this thing once already, I'm satisfied; from now on, I'd rather see a different country win it every year)


BURR [36045]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 19:01:10

@ Tim - [16334]

Someome named Roman Abramovich will be happy to buy ou UK shares
then there will be new 'BIG4"


BURR [36045]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 18:51:53

@ Tim - [16334]

the easiest solution for the UK to quit ant not to send all that rubbish they did for the last 6 years


Tim - [16334]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 18:45:42

Well I liked the Norwegian song was nice as well, I would have much preferred that it won than the Russian one!

I agree that it is just a song contest, and therefore not that important, but it has been suggested that the contest is to try to 'unite' countries. However, it is not just 'not uniting', it is doing precisely the opposite, it is dividing nations, in terms of a song contest anyway. However meaningless the ESC it it is quite powerful to those people (ie everyday people, you and me) because it is about the only annual contest that has live voting between European countries. It is incredibly devisive, and full of predudice.

As many have said the ESC is currently quite important to many countries in eastern Europe, but all the while that it is seen as 'unfair' then it is devisive.

The easiest solution is to have two contest, one for the east, and one for the west. If people want the two winners to have a final run - off, great, and perhaps then that run off should alternate between east and west.


BURR [36045]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 18:44:15

@ Mina Carnation [51405]

Sold or mot - it's Moscow 2009!
Not Athens


Mina Carnation [51405]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 17:47:45

''Lets not be naive about the east of Europe, they have no interest in 'uniting' with the west of Europe other than to fulfill their own needs; the concept of unity does not come into it ''

We're talking about a song contest Tim, and you're making it sound like Stalin is about to take over Europe..lol

Ofcourse it's about unity...one of the most important things to those countries is to feel 'acknowledged' by the rest of Europe. To you (and to me, since Greece has been taking part in ESC since 1974) Eurovision is an old story, to them it's new. It's a way to feel proud of their (new) countries.

And by the way, it's not true that the east doesn't vote for the west..they do, when they like the song. Norway got more points by eastern countries than by western ones this year.

And I'm the least prejudiced person in the world (I consider myself neither eastern nor western, just European) but I have to admit the only song from the western Europe I loved this year was Norway (and San Marino and Portugal but those 2 weren't even voted by western countries).


Tim - [16334]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 17:34:58

The point is to unite, really?

That may be ok in theory, but the reality is that it does not make it unite. It's a bit like saying lets make a very hungry large dog 'unite' with a small cat in in a cage...the result will be that they will scrap, or the cat may even be eaten.

Lets not be naive about the east of Europe, they have no interest in 'uniting' with the west of Europe other than to fulfill their own needs; the concept of unity does not come into it


Mina Carnation [51405]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 17:14:35

Or, why not splitting Finland in 2...the left part to the east and the right to the west?

I'm joking ofcourse but I find this solution funny anyway. The point of eurovision is to unite, not to divide, isn't it?


Tim - [16334]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 16:51:14

I agree Marc, the only fair way to deal with this is to split off the east from the original countries and have 2 contests. Don't even pretent that the west of Europe has much in common with the east, except the word 'Europe' is used for both.
With 2 contests, the east can all vote for each other, as they have always done. As regards Nordic countries, Norway, Iceland and Denmark and Finland could come to the west and Sweden can can go East. Oh and Greece can be west, and Cyprus East...


marc x [47152]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 14:13:24

I really do feel the EBU should split the current contest into the original countries and all the Eastern European countries. And please let Greece go to the second half.... Btw dear Mina, friday I will be for 10 days is Greece, go to our house in Thinos, where you can find some nice Greek people...


Mina Carnation [51405]
Mon 9 Jun 2008 14:08:56

''This year the whole festival has been sold to Russia''

But the previous years Russia was too poor to buy it? Or maybe Serbia bought it too? Or Finland? I knew those monsters looked suspicious!
LOL


The list of 149 reactions is divided into 6 pages. Choose a page:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

React yourself

Closed for reactions
This news article is older than one week. Reacting to articles is only possible in the first week after publication.

































22/Nov/2008

185 visitors online

25 members online

31451 members

149 reactions today

Set as home page!

Search news

Tools


More news

Country pages

Share!

Do you have news for esctoday.com? Please let us know! You can submit your newsitem in our contact centre!

Hot Items


Tip!